The second semester for the graduate courses runs from February ??, 2025 -- May ??, 2025.

Lecturer and course coordinator: Joost J. Joosten

Teaching assistant: ???.

This is a course of 6 credits which corresponds to 45 contact hours and the students are supposed to dedicate at least 75 more hours of individual work. Since we do three hours a week, this will correspond to 15 weeks.

Official information regarding the course is published at the course pages of the UB. From there, one can redirect to the courses. The lectures will take place in Aula 406 in the Montalegre Building.

The lecture schedule is as follows:

Mondays 12:00 -- 14:00

Tuesdays 13:00 -- 14:00

We strongly advice students to follow the course in the so-called continua mode. Here we will have take-home exercises, a mid-term exam and a final exam.

Date and location midterm exam: TBA;

Date and location final exam: TBA.

The distribution of points in the final grade is as follows:

Take-home exercises: See teaching plan %

Midterm exam: See teaching plan %

Final exam: See teaching plan %

Students may also decide --even though we stronly would like to discourage this-- to participate in the so-called avaluació única.

Date and location avaluació única exam: June 2, 2025, 12:00 -- 14:00, Aula 406.

Date and location resit exam: June 30, 2025, 12:00 -- 14:00, Aula 406.

As mentioned, the lecturer is Joost J. Joosten and the best way to contact is by sending an email. You can also come around to see if I'm in: the Montalegre building in Room 4045 with phone number +34 934031939.

There will be no lectures on

?;

?

?

Further, we shall see how giving a constructive reading to the connectives gives rise to a different logic: constructive or intuitionistic logic. Naturally this requires a ontological stance very different from platonism/realism underlying classical logic. If time allows we shall see how contstructive logic can be related both to classical and to modal logic.

• To get an understanding how modalities add a subtle and complex dimension to reasoning;

• See a couple of standard modal logics and reason in them;

• Understand the ontological presupposition that underly constructive reasoning;

• Understand the ontological presupposition that underly classical reasoning;

• Understand the fundamental difference and tension between the two.

• Learn formal reasoning systems in Natural Deduction style;

• Learn formal reasoning systems in Gentzen Deduction style;

• Learn and understand proofs by induction

• Study modal semantics;

• Learning how to apply the soundness theorem to obtain non-derivability results;

• Learning how to apply the completenss theorem to obtain provability without actually exhibiting a concrete proof

THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE NEEDS UPDATING

Week 1 | Week 2 | |

Week 3 | Week 4 | |

Week 5 | Week 6 | |

Week 7 | Week 8 | |

Week 9 | Week 10 | |

Week 11 | Week 12 | |

Week 13 | Week 14 |

We dwelled on what logic is about, what ontological assumptions are subsumed by classical logic and how this can be challenged and how this is challenged by constructive logic. In the tradition of Brouwer, this is often also known as intuitionistic logic refering the intuition involved in Kant's A priori synthetic knowledge of mathematics. We also discussed how various anomalies plagued foundations of mathematics and logic at the turn of the 19th century.

Examples of Kripke semantics at work.

Here is the final version of the reader. Please do consult the material that you need from here. Note that there is of course more material.